« Washington State Death Index, 1907-1960, Now Online | Main | Special Sale - Digital Family History Guidebook - 25% off »

April 23, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Can we take our own pictures for the background and send them in for printing without making them public? I see the ones you have for sharing are 72 dpi. Is that sufficient or are you holding another copy at higher resolution for the actual printing?

JL, yes, if you use your own digital picture as a background, it won't be shared with anyone. Regarding resolution, the pictures I've taken with my digital camera end up being 72dpi. I've had charts printed using them as backgrounds and they look really good.

It's great and looks nice. I have only tried it so far with my Mother's side,now for the rest of my family and my husbands.

I'm working on a chart for some-one else that looks like it would end up about 50" wide. I use a program called Autostitch for making panoramas and have calculated at 300 dpi (usual printing practice) it would take about a dozen pictures across and 3 rows deep, taking into consideration overlap and the natural curvature of panos. The picture would be about 18,000 pixels wide! Does that even sound right? Pictures come off their digital camera at 180 dpi. I'm trying to get a definitive take on this, as they're moving across the country, and plan to make one last trip to a special location where, I've heard, they intend to set up a tripod on the beach.

Autostitch is a fantastic program. I've looked at costly alternatives and none compare in quality and ease. To your question, 50" wide by 300 dpi, assuming that each dot represent a pixel, is 15,000 pixels wide. That sounds correct. Based on the 3 rows high, you would have approximately 3,750 pixels high.

How do you intend to produce the printed panorama of that size?

I'm hoping that's Legacy's job.

15,000 pixels sounds like alot but it's still only about 4 feet across, and about a foot deep if I remember right.

Legacy Charting has boxes 3 columns wide. This makes the picture quite small and the chart very wide. There needs to be an option to make boxes one column wide with the picture at the top and information at the bottom so that charts would not be so wide.

Wendell, this can already be done. In the Box Items section, just keep everything in the same column. Then sort the picture to the top. Or, select the Mug Shot theme, and it will do as you request.

I love the new chart photo of the covered wagon. Thank you to the submitter.

I've played with my new charting capability. Unfortunately, my ancestors tended to have "litters" rather than a few children, & just doing a "simple" 3 generation descendant chart ends up being over 25 feet in width (which seems rather excessive). One of the reasons for the excessive width is that the last generation's spouses are placed on the same line as the descendant. (When I manually dragged the spouses & placed them below each descendant, slightly indenting them so that multiple spouses were clearly denoted, it reduced the overall size of the chart tremendously!) Could you possibly consider this feature on a future version of Legacy Charting Deluxe? I figure since the last line in the descendants chart isn't going to show the children descending from them anyway, there's no reason to make the chart wider by placing the spouse(s) on the same line... Thanks for you consideration of this.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Legacy 8.0

Facebook

Receive news by email

Search this site


  • legacynews.typepad.com
Share |

Top 25 Genealogy Blog